Stories
West Virginia Works on Rules to Certify Microgrids and Data Centers
After more than 900 public comments were submitted regarding proposed rules for how the West Virginia Department of Commerce will certify microgrids and high impact data centers in the state, the joint Legislative Rule-Making Review Committee approved several changes to the proposals during a meeting Wednesday. The proposed rules relate to last year’s passage of House Bill 2014, which created the certified microgrid program and set policies for how certain data centers that come to the state may operate. In this rule-making process, the Department of Commerce was tasked specifically with creating rules for how the secretary should approach certifying microgrids and high impact data centers and what information should be considered while doing so. Throughout a public comment period in December 2025, 935 individual comments were submitted from residents who held concerns over portions of the rule as well as the legislation as a whole. Nicholas Preservati, who serves as the deputy secretary for the Department of Commerce, told lawmakers that the agency split public comments into five main categories: economic concerns, environmental concerns, public transparency concerns, local control concerns and infrastructure concerns. Stay informed about all things microgrids and distributed energy. Subscribe to the free, weekly Energy Changemakers Newsletter. According to a summary created by the Department of Commerce, a “significant number” of the comments submitted did not apply to the rules that were under review. Instead, per the agency, they applied to the legislation as a whole, which has already been enacted and stands as law. The rule-making process cannot change the law as it’s written; it can only clarify how certain portions of it will be applied. Preservati said he and others at Commerce read through all of the comments and used them to inform changes to the rule. Developers must flag any “inordinate burden” on community Changes proposed by the Department of Commerce and approved by lawmakers Wednesday included adding language clarifying that any high impact data center or microgrid must follow state and federal environmental laws, redefining “nearly contiguous property” for parcels within the districts and giving explicit authority to the Secretary of Commerce to request any information from applicants and work with other agencies before certifying, among other things. Another change — perhaps the most material one — was the inclusion of how developers and the Department of Commerce will handle a potential “inordinate burden” posed by the potential high impact data center or microgrid. Per the approved rules, developers who apply for certification must flag if their proposed project could place a significant and unreasonable burden on nearby property owners due to its location, environmental risks it may bring, the proximity to schools, homes or historic sites and more. Developers will have to share how they plan to offset those potential harms and the Department of Commerce will have the right to independently verify or challenge claims made by the developers. In committee on Wednesday, Preservati — who also serves as the director of the state’s Office of Energy — said the inordinate burden language was added in response to numerous public comments from individuals concerned that HB 2014 strips local governments from having the power to regulate how certified microgrids or data centers operate within their communities. “There [were] a lot of public comments requesting, you know, how can we do this? Where’s the public? Where are they involved, and how are they protected?” Preservati told the committee. “So that was added in response to that.” Sen. Patricia Rucker, R-Jefferson, and others thanked Preservati for including the language. While Del. Kayla Young, D-Kanawha, said she appreciated its inclusion, she shared concerns about how it was framed. Learn more about data centers and microgrids. Listen to the Energy Changemakers Podcast, now among the top 10% for listenership of podcasts globally https://youtu.be/6iTLeONIkIs Based on the rules, the developers are the only ones responsible for flagging potential risks that their projects could bring. She said this could be especially concerning since the public is not required to be made aware of developers seeking certification or the projects they are proposing. “Is it concerning?” Young asked Preservati. “What are your thoughts on the fact that the person who the burden is being placed upon is unaware of this entirely and the person making the determination (that something could be a burden) is the petitioner, not the person with whom the burden would be on?” Preservati said that the Department of Commerce “recognized” that concern. The letter of intent to become certified as well as documents provided by developers seeking certification are kept confidential on purpose, he said, so it’s expected that the general public will not know whether an “inordinate burden” is coming to their communities. But, he said, developers will be expected to include any things that “the average person should be able to recognize” — like schools and certain topography or environmental features — could be affected by the developments. If they don’t, he continued, the secretary has the “authority unilaterally” to investigate all claims made. “We added that as part of this discussion to create a second check and balance for the secretary,” Preservati said. Who redacts competitive information from public filings? Young proposed an amendment to the rules that would have required the Department of Commerce to create a redacted version of filings for the public to view and access when a developer sought out certification. She said this was necessary so members of the public would have enough information to appeal a certification or voice concerns about it before it became finalized. Redacted information would have included confidential business information, which has become a key tension point in several communities as developers seek permits (separate from the certification process) to construct microgrids and data center complexes. Her amendment addressed several concerns shared in public comments submitted during the rule-making process as well as comments from numerous residents who live in communities where data centers are being proposed. From Mingo County to Tucker County, residents have been clear that they feel the state is not making a good-faith effort to be transparent during these proceedings. Per Young’s amendment, it would have been up to Commerce to decide what information qualified as […]
Survey Shows Bullish Microgrid Industry Innovating to Meet New Market Demand
The microgrid industry appears to be innovating its way out of the funding dilemma caused by the loss of incentives in 2025.
New Mexico Bill Calls for State Commission to Review Large Microgrids
A New Mexico state senator has proposed the state regulate large microgrids out of concern that data centers will use fossil fuel generation.
How Commercial and Industrial Microgrids Are Evolving in the Age of the Data Center
Competition for grid power is increasing demand for commercial and industrial microgrids in the era of the data center.
Microgrid Growth in Canada, Central and South America
Spring Lane Capital’s recent CA$100M investment announcement offers an example of animation in Canada’s market.
Microgrids to Ease Painfully High Electricity Costs in the Bahamas
The Bahamas expects a fleet of microgrids to lower electricity costs, provide resilience, and help the islands cut carbon emissions.